Yeah, the house ethics committee wouldn't cover up for a fellow gangster,
would they?
I guess, I should have said he "allegedly". As far as I'm concerned he
should have been tossed out for that and other such activities.

JH

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ed Leafe
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 2:44 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] All quiet on the G.ay O.ld P.arty front?

On Aug 29, 2007, at 3:33 PM, John Harvey wrote:

> I think he's a democrat in republican clothing. I assume like when  
> we howled
> about barney frank running a male escort service and then he still got
> reelected?

        I guess it's too difficult to expect some people to tell the truth.

"In 1990, the House voted to reprimand Frank when it was revealed  
that Steve Gobie, a male escort whom Frank had befriended after  
hiring him through a personal advertisement, claimed to have  
conducted an escort service from Frank's apartment when he was not at  
home. Frank had dismissed Gobie earlier that year and reported the  
incident to the House Ethics Committee after learning of Gobie's  
activities. After an investigation, the House Ethics Committee found  
no evidence that Frank had known of or been involved in the alleged  
illegal activity."

(from Wikipedia)

        I sure hope that you don't ever have to testify in a criminal case,

and that the defense lawyer uses these posts as evidence of your  
honesty.

-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com




[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@shelbynet.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to