On Wednesday, August 29, 2007 4:00 PM John Harvey wrote: >Yeah, the house ethics committee wouldn't cover up for a fellow gangster, would they? >I guess, I should have said he "allegedly". As far as I'm concerned he should have been tossed out for >that and other such activities.
http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c176/skibumcolo/republican-scandals-pi c.jpg David L. Crooks _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
