On Sep 3, 2007, at 12:59 PM, mrgmhale wrote:
> Re: 2006 vs 2007 (much NAV2008 that is now out), NAV2006 is a fine
> version
> to stay on. NAV2007 is a little simpler looking, until one needs
> to get
> into the inner workings to set certain options that are not as
> obvious to
> find. And, NAV2007 is supposedly a bit better at intercepting
> Spyware than
> 2006. I have used both in places where SAV Corporate is not used,
> and both
> do a fine job.
The point is this: unless 2006 can be kept current with all
necessary malware protection, staying with an outdated (and hence
dangerous) version is not an option.
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
