100% secure, but what about 95%?
--- Paul McNett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael Madigan wrote: > > OK, I got into a real fight with someone this week > on > > requiring a computer be secure before it is > attached > > to a network. > > > > By secure I mean, anti-spyware, anti-virus, > up-to-date > > on patches, and firewall. > > > > It got me to thinking, do you think it would be > wise, > > somehow, for ISPs to require anti-virus and > > anti-spyware to be running on a computer before > it's > > allowed to connect to their system? And how would > it > > be implemented. > > > > My thoughts are that if every computer was secure, > we > > would have far less Internet traffic caused by > > spambots, and would actually give us a much better > > Internet experience. > > > > Any thoughts? > > Yes, that the very idea of a usable, secure Windows > box is laughable. > > > -- > pkm ~ http://paulmcnett.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: [email protected] > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: > http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, > are the opinions of the author, and do not > constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are > too stupid to see the obvious. > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
