Ed Leafe wrote: > On Nov 27, 2007, at 5:50 PM, Bill Arnold wrote: > > >> On the other hand, MS will have to do *something* in a few years. >> > > Why? The landscape is littered with abandoned Microsoft products. > Why should VFP be treated any different? > > >> I'm guessing/hoping they will turn the product over to some entity >> that will >> take the ball and run with it. Then *they* can do this. >> > > 'Hoping' is the right word here. IMO, it'll never happen. >
Ed's right, Bill...there's no reason for M$ to do that. None whatsoever. -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
