mrgmhale wrote: > I hate to even come off as tromping on this opportunity you have come across > Nick. That is the last thing I would want to do. But Rick's point is > really well grounded. IMHO one of the very last things that ought to be > considered for a software/solution development project is what language to > use, unless there is a really good reason or excuse to use a particular > language due to current familiarity and knowing it will adapt well in > producing a great result.
At the same time, remember that "I don't know" might well be an answer you hear over and over again. 32-bit only or will you need 64 in the future? "We don't know" Will you need to run on non-Windows platforms in the future? "We don't know" Do you need transactions/SPs/whatever in the future? "We don't know" So, given these requirements.... well, you get my point? Whil _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
