On Dec 10, 2007, at 5:26 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
> No you have thousands of options and YOUR requirement tosses 90% or
> more out
> of the pool before we have business requirements or functional
> requirements.
Nobody "tossed" anything; it was a matter of "all other needs being
met", and then moving from there.
Obviously if the only way to meet the needs would be to lock into a
single-point-of-failure solution, then that is the way to go.
However, it has been my experience that the only reason people ever
see only one solution is that that is the only one they are familiar
with. E.g.: I know tool X, and X only runs on Linux, so we have to
switch to Linux. That kind of thinking is why most projects fail.
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
