Yes, I agree - that would be a win-win situation. .Net does have it (and allows you to edit the text file then loads it in visual designer, unless you messed it too bad). That would have been a nice feature if we had it in vfp... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ed Leafe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 6:04 PM Subject: Re: CVS and visual classes
> On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:57 AM, Grigore Dolghin wrote: > >> Hehehe, Ed, that's a long talk :) Visual approach has some >> advantages as >> well (such as aligning controls, and stuff like that). I wouldn't >> want to do >> that in a prg class (this assuming that the classes contain some >> elaborated >> controls). > > You missed the point: I was asking *if* you could design/edit > visually, but store the class in a PRG instead of a VCX, what > possible reason would there be to prefer the binary format? I'm > assuming that VFP can use both equally well. > > There is nothing in a VCX that cannot be in a PRG. The problem is > that VFP has a severe limitation in that its visual design tools can > only work with binary format files. > > -- Ed Leafe > -- http://leafe.com > -- http://dabodev.com > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
