Hi Paul > I'm not about to be critical of my boss
Of course. > - he has (at least, > historically) good reasons for doing things the way he has There is no good reason for keeping everything in one vcx. Everyone I've ever asked said they didn't think of it or know any better. Even Drew Speedie entertained the idea of writing a program to degroup his classes but was voted down for reasons involving the status quo. > - and to > break out the classes from the one VCX would be a massive amount of work > and would have lots of ramifications throughout the system because of > the way it is all tied in with product licensing issues And that's only more reasons to keep the status quo. > ... but I want to be aware of the issues and to at least voice my concerns IMO the entire converting VCX to text is a huge imperfect work-around to a problem which should never have started. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
