On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:57 AM, Grigore Dolghin wrote:
> Hehehe, Ed, that's a long talk :) Visual approach has some
> advantages as
> well (such as aligning controls, and stuff like that). I wouldn't
> want to do
> that in a prg class (this assuming that the classes contain some
> elaborated
> controls).
You missed the point: I was asking *if* you could design/edit
visually, but store the class in a PRG instead of a VCX, what
possible reason would there be to prefer the binary format? I'm
assuming that VFP can use both equally well.
There is nothing in a VCX that cannot be in a PRG. The problem is
that VFP has a severe limitation in that its visual design tools can
only work with binary format files.
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
