On Monday 28 January 2008 12:57, Jean Laeremans wrote: > Or the one who sold him the gun ?
Hi Jean! Yes, he mishandled the gun. He was most likely sober when he bought it, however. If he didn't have a record (which would have been checked) then he would be cleared legal to buy, the seller having done all the checking possible. The people who create and maintain the records have been known to fail to include things that should be included. The alcohol lobby works hard to keep drunkenness out of all records, even DRIVING records. Drunk DRIVING is way-the-hell more lethal, by the way, where not only the drunk but carloads of other people are injured or killed. I haven't seen any jihads on this list about DRUNK DRIVING. Maybe it is not about securing life with the anti-gunners at all? -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
