SMB small buisiness 2003 server with exchange.
I use it here and its ok. I can set up email ok. I would say though that
linux and mailman once the guys here had given help was easier to work with
than SMB. My only problem was I needed windows server for web services using
vfp.
But it had IMAP/POP3 smtp news groups. I had to add anothers IRC server as
2003 has taken the goodies out. Also I have not yet found how to make email
groups like mailman as it seems to want active users as members. I think
there is a way but Ive yet to get to grips, or find time, to get it going.
I brought my 2003 SMB off ebay, silly thing to do as it was shown as premium
but there was no SQL. At least it was a genuine version, something fairly
rare on ebay. (dig at ebays careless attitude to pirate dvd and software)
Allen 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Nicholas Geti
Sent: 29 January 2008 06:25
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [NS] Discuss Microsoft Exchange Server and equivalents

As I read more, I found that the 32-bit version of Exchange Server is only
for testing and is not allowed for production. I found several references to
SMB which indicate that it is a combination of Server 2003 and Exchange
Server 2003. The bundle is a lot cheaper than either purchased separately.


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.15/1248 - Release Date: 28/01/2008
21:32
 



_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to