On Jan 29, 2008, at 6:24 AM, Eyvind Axelsen wrote:
> I think the point here is that if you want to do this in fox, you
> have to do a lot of 'roll your own', versus with Visual Studio
> and .NET, a lot of the complexity and ugly details concerned with
> packing and unpacking objects is hidden from you, and 'it just
> works' (most of the time). That is my experience, anyway.
The 'S' in 'SOAP' was supposed to stand for 'Simple', but Microsoft
and others have made SOAP so complicated that the only way to use it
effectively is to lock into their tools. Once you get used to all that
black magic happening under the hood, it's just so easy to continue to
rely on the tool, and before you know it, you're locked into a
platform again.
-- Ed
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
