Rick Schummer wrote: > <snipped> > because Microsoft did not hold a formal beta, and those > who reported issues never received any feedback that the issues were being > looked at and fixed if > appropriate. This combination turned a lot of people off, and now we have to > live with the results, > which stinks. >
And what motivation/reason (and most important cost factor) would they have for doing a formal beta for SP3? As Bernhard Bout's comment said, it looks as though they just couldn't care less. -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
