I'm not saying experience is everything, but it does count. Obama, to me , is an unknown who just kind of came out of nowhere. I hadn't heard much about him before he was asked to speak at the Democratic National Convention in 2004. Still, I don't have a sence about his management style, the kind of cabinet he would assemble, the kind of Supreme Court justices he would nominate, who he would select as the top echelon for our military, etc. It just seem, to me, that Hilliary is much better connected to assemble the best team to put us back on the path to peace through diplomacy, and prosperity.
Regards, LelandJ Ed Leafe wrote: > On Feb 13, 2008, at 11:27 AM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > > >> Hillary Clinton has seen all of this up close and personal, and has a >> network of very qualified colleagues from whom she can select her >> cabinet and other high white house appointments, so who better to have >> as President in this day and time? >> > > One of the great lessons of the Bush administration is that > Experience != Quality. > > In 2001, who had more experience in defense matters than Dick Cheney > and Donald Rumsfeld? > > -- Ed Leafe > > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
