Excerpt:
North Dakota alone is theoretically capable of producing enough wind 
power to meet more than one-third of U.S. electricity demand, according 
to the American Wind Energy Association.

http://news-service.stanford.edu/news/2003/may21/wind-521.html

or

http://tinyurl.com/393jqb

Regards,

LelandJ


kam wrote:
> Or geothermal (popular here in N. California)
>
> Supposedly N. Dakota could easily generate enough Wind power for the entire 
> USA and Canada for at least 100 years at the present 
> rate of growth. They just need the money to build the turbines and an 
> efficient way to deliver the power.
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Michael Madigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 12:00 PM
> Subject: Re: [OT] smart car going electric
>
>
> It's also polution free for solar, wind and hydro.
>
> It isn't pollution free for coal, but I believe it is
> cleaner since many coal facilies have been cleaned up.
>
>
>
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>   
>>> "As proven in laboratory tests at Daimler, the
>>> high-temperature battery that is located under the
>>> floor of the vehicle has a lifetime of at least
>>>       
>> 1,000
>>     
>>> charging cycles, which is equivalent to a calendar
>>> lifetime of around ten years."
>>>       
>>> How do they figure that's 10 years?  IF you charge
>>>       
>> it
>>     
>>> every day, isn't it 3 years?
>>>       
>> And it's not polution free... the electricity has to
>> be generated somehow... unless it's nuclear.
>>
>> --
>> Larry Miller
>>
>> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
>> multipart/mixed
>>   multipart/alternative
>>     text/plain (text body -- kept)
>>     text/html
>>   message/rfc822
>> ---
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Post Messages to: [email protected]
>> Subscription Maintenance:
>> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
>> OT-free version of this list:
>> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
>> Searchable Archive:
>> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
>> This message:
>>
>>     
> http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   
>> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,
>> are the opinions of the author, and do not
>> constitute legal or medical advice. This statement
>> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are
>> too stupid to see the obvious.
>>
>>     
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to