>> I assume that the same attitude that pervades all of UT will apply to this 
>> endeavor, too.<<

You may doubt all you want Ed, that is your choice. I would not expect you to 
benefit from a Fox
resource like this Fox-oriented magazine, but others might. I am sure you are 
making this direct
observation from actually reading the old version to make such a broad 
assumption such as this. I
personally think the UT is the center of the negative energy in the Fox 
Universe, yet I found the
information in the old UT Magazine to be quite good. Some very bright people 
write for this magazine
and the content was worth the time I spent reading it. Can't ask for much more. 
I have not read
every word of every issue and might even have missed many issues completely, 
but I don't ever recall
reading anything that resembled the stereotypical reputation the UT has made 
for itself over the
years.

Heck, I hang out here in the center of the anti-Microsoft Fox Universe because 
I learn something by
listening to the answers and opinions of smart people. That does not mean I 
would consider a
resource such as the ProFox archive list to be worthless because a few people 
take cheap shots at
the Evil Empire, or drop "Dabo-can" answers to a VFP-specific question every 
few messages.

>>"Separate"? You mean the name is just a coincidence?<<

Coincidence of the name is the owner and branding, but you can read the 
magazine without having to
visit the forum and deal with the UT politics. It is a *separate* resource with 
knowledge coming
from the authors, not necessarily the UT owner or the trolls who make the forum 
an unhappy place.
The UT Mag was free, but I am not sure it will be in its second life. So why 
not take advantage of
the resource if it can make one's development life better?

Rick
White Light Computing, Inc.

www.whitelightcomputing.com
www.swfox.net
www.rickschummer.com






_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to