On Mar 20, 2008, at 9:08 PM, Paul Hill wrote:
> Still smells a little of censorship to me.
I don't agree. The ProFoxTech is already "censored" for those who
can't have or don't want non-technical stuff; right now we rely on
people acting in a decent and responsible manner to achieve this.
There are several people who have exhibited complete disregard for the
community standards for ProFoxTech; this is simply a reaction to the
reality that not everyone is a decent person.
> Sorry Ed, I'm not blaming you for this as I'm sure you have your
> reasons, after all it's your
> mailing list.
Wrong again. This list belongs to the community; I personally think
that there should not be a filtered ProFoxTech list, but the
overwhelming verdict of the community was to create it, so I did. I
don't impose my feelings on the list.
> I've quickly scanned the list but I'm still not entirely sure what
> prompted this. There's not *that* many OT posts in NF.
Hmm... I guess if you got all the personal emails complaining about
non-tech stuff on the tech list that I do, you might see things
otherwise.
-- Ed Leafe
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
