On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 8:32 PM, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>         OK, let's clear things up a bit. Clicking on the link in the
> footer
> doesn't do anything except record your objection in the database, and
> notify me that someone thinks that there is a problem. That's it. It
> doesn't "ban" anybody or anything like that.
>
>        If it comes to pass that the same person has been flagged several
> times for things that were clearly [OT], then what would happen is
> this: their address would be added to the 'hold' queue for ProFoxTech
> *only*. Remember how mail to these lists goes:
>
> Post -> ProFox -> OT Filter -> ProFoxTech
>
>        So even the individual who has been put in the hold queue for
> ProFoxTech will have their message posted immediately to the main
> list, and also entered in the archives. If the content is appropriate
> for the ProFoxTech list, I will then release that post from the hold
> queue, and then subscribers to the ProFoxTech list will see it. If the
> post is clearly [OT], it will not be forwarded to the ProFoxTech list.
>
>        I hope that that clears up the process a little better.
>
> -- Ed Leafe
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sounds like a lot of work that you have to take on.

-- 
Stephen Russell
Sr. Production Systems Programmer
Mimeo.com
Memphis TN

901.246-0159


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to