AFAIK there is no such thing as positioning the record pointer; at least in MS-SQL. That's more of an xBase point of view.
John Weller wrote: > But that won't position the record pointer - which is what I wanted. > Personally I prefer to use a SEEK instead of SET RELATION TO to position the > record pointer for whatever I need. I accept your point that SQL is more > general but I can't see anyone ever wanting to move code to another > language, there are too many differences so it would be a re-write job > anyway. > > John Weller > -- Richard Kaye Vice President Artfact/RFC Systems Voice: 617.219.1038 Fax: 617.219.1001 For the fastest response time, please send your support queries to: Technical Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED] All Other Requests - [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------- This message has been checked for viruses before sending. --------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
