John Weller wrote: > But that won't position the record pointer - which is what I wanted. > Personally I prefer to use a SEEK instead of SET RELATION TO to position the > record pointer for whatever I need. I accept your point that SQL is more > general but I can't see anyone ever wanting to move code to another > language, there are too many differences so it would be a re-write job > anyway. > >
Ever since flakiness in VFP5 on a Novell network (yes, I know that wasn't a good combo apparently), I've steered clear of SET RELATION as when I got away from direct table access and instead used views or some other disconnected dataset approach, the flakiness went away. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
