On Apr 2, 2008, at 2:31 PM, David Crooks wrote:
> There are many ways to look at facts and in this case, Ed, you seem to
> be looking for historical facts where there are few, if any around.
> The
> Christian church has controlled (which is what religions do - control
> you) the facts for over the 2,000+ years. If folks get something from
> the bible or some other document or teaching then they should have the
> free will to follow their path.
Again, no one is arguing otherwise.
Stephen started this thread with this subject. IOW, the question is
did someone named Jesus actually exist, and is the description of him
in the Bible historically accurate. My point is that such a question
is meaningless, as there can be no way to prove something that
happened over 2000 years ago, and because this is a matter of faith,
not history, the answer shouldn't matter to anyone who believes in it.
-- Ed Leafe
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
