Hi Ed I'd rather you just bounce them back to the sender. That way at least the poster gets feedback that they made a mistake. To err is human. To build software that doesn't appreciate that fact is unfortunately all too common.
Frankly it's a PITA (using gmail) to remember to switch to plain text, edit the subject, delete the stuff before and after the post in question and then to try to remember whether to use top or bottom posting. My habit is click reply type something click send. I save my cranial exersions for work. Any good suggestions to simplifying replying to Profox with gmail will be appreciated. Mike Yearwood > From: "Ed Leafe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 24 April 2008 15:40:21 o'clock (GMT) Europe/London > Subject: [ADMIN] Replying To Digests > > > Does anyone think it's time to filter out posts based on the presence > of 'ProFox Digest' in the subject? > > Ed _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
