>Well if your safety is at stake and all you are looking towards is to wait
>for the big government check because your family member was on a bridge that
>collapsed, so be it.
Interesting the argument for higher taxes always makes comparison to one of the
few essential things the government is doing. No one ever bemoans the fact
that boondoggle programs will be cut... because they won't. The rule is to
always fund the lowest priorities first. That way when the money runs out, the
come back to the taxpayers for money for the 'important' government functions.
If the bridges are more important than the pork, that's where the money should
go. When we keep giving in to those arguments we feed their addiction to pork.
There is NO argument for higher taxes that is not really an argument for
cutting waste!
--
Larry Miller
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/mixed
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
message/rfc822
---
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
