On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 11:14 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Well if your safety is at stake and all you are looking towards is to > wait > >for the big government check because your family member was on a bridge > that > >collapsed, so be it. > > Interesting the argument for higher taxes always makes comparison to one > of the few essential things the government is doing. No one ever bemoans > the fact that boondoggle programs will be cut... because they won't. The > rule is to always fund the lowest priorities first. That way when the money > runs out, the come back to the taxpayers for money for the 'important' > government functions. > > If the bridges are more important than the pork, that's where the money > should go. When we keep giving in to those arguments we feed their > addiction to pork. There is NO argument for higher taxes that is not really > an argument for cutting waste! > -----------------------------------------------------
I am not looking at any NEW spending which I regard as Pork.. This is continual upkeep for infrastructure. Repaving, new surface, structural inspections and repairs. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer Mimeo.com Memphis TN 901.246-0159 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
