At 10:29 AM 5/6/2008 +0100, Alan Bourke wrote: >On Mon, 05 May 2008 14:37:05 -0500, "Charlie Coleman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >said: > > > Actually, from what I've seen to date, 98 is mostly better than Vista. > >A graphical front-end to 16-bit MSDOS, with a crap file system, bad >security, crap multi-tasking, shaky network stack is better than Vista? >How exactly?
It didn't fight me at every turn. It didn't try to hide what it was really doing and access to system settings actually made sense. It didn't phone home to mommy every few seconds. It made an efficient use of hardware resources. As for your other issues regarding multi-tasking, shaky network, and security.... you think these are good in Vista???? ROFL -Charlie _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
