On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:02 PM, MB Software Solutions General Account <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Malcolm Greene wrote:
> > Thanks again for that tip. I'm mocking up some prototypes for a proposal
> > and your tip will help me immensely. Funny, I really preferred the right
> > justified look, but after reading Jakob's article, I'm cured of that
> > opinion. (Must resist the urge to gold plate the specs and make label
> > justification data driven<g>).
> >
> > Its funny how we can be influenced by what looks good ('sexy') when we
> > design vs. have to actually use our own software (eg. eat our own dog
> > food).
> >
>
> VFP work or what?
>
> This can be an exciting time! I like doing mock ups if I feel like I've
> got a shot at the job! However, after the last mockup--which was
> extensive--I wondered if I should affix a price to that, similar to how
> a builder does for house plans.
>
> What's the ProFox community's consensus on that--charging for
> mockups/prototypes?
>
-------------------------------------------
$$$$ talks for the time wireframes or mock ups need to be useful. Never
free from my POV, past a napkin that is.
YMMV
--
Stephen Russell
Sr. Production Systems Programmer
Mimeo.com
Memphis TN
901.246-0159
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
