Hello Rick, Yes, it does sound extreme on a network. This app is single user and only runs on the users machine local, so no network traffic to worry about. I think I will change it to 1 second just to be safe ... Thanks for your help, Kent
> > Kent, > > >> Ok, I have it working now, not sure exactly what change > fixed it but > >> I did SET REFRESH TO 1,.01 > The second parameter was missing in my first tests and is important.<< > > I think a 100th of a second for a refresh is considered > extreme. I am not even sure VFP can physically refresh the > data that quick. You will minimally be flooding the network > with indexes and data buffers, which will bog the entire > system down. Have you tested this in a network configuration? > All VFP will be able to do is refresh the data, which means > things like committing changes back to the server will slow > down significantly. > > > Rick > White Light Computing, Inc. > > www.whitelightcomputing.com > www.swfox.net > www.rickschummer.com > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
