Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > > MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: > >> Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: >> <snipped> >> >>> The USA really need to remain committed to the idea of becoming energy >>> independent via a new era of clean renewable energy, and get off a USA >>> petrol based/dependent economy. >>> >> >> Ok, so other than the spent nuclear waste that doesn't break down for >> hundreds of years, what's wrong with creating nuclear plants all over >> the nation? Or is that for a different energy problem? If the nuke >> plants can make all of this electricity and we use electric cars, >> problem solved? Surely not....it couldn't be that simple...right? >> > I don't like nuclear energy; because, nuclear energy, and its by > products, are toxic to all forms of life. Nuclear energy can be erratic > and unpredictable. It requires much more regulation, supervision, > backup systems, and security that other forms of energy, because it is > so dangerous. Even if all the required systems are in place, accidents > still seem to happen. > > Any accident with nuclear energy could cause mass destruction of > facilities, equipment, land, and people for miles and miles, and the > danger from such an accident could linger for years to come. If a > nuclear reactor did overheat and bust losoe, you certainly wouldn't want > the wind from it blowing in your direction.
Tell me again what you'd like to see (since it's not nuclear energy)? _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
