Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
> kam wrote:
>   
>> The obvious answer is to take the profits away from the oil companies and 
>> distribute it to the poor.
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 3:42 PM
>> Subject: Re: [OT]High price of gas
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jun 23, 2008, at 5:34 PM, MB Software Solutions General Account
>> wrote:
>>
>>   
>>     
>>> Tell me again what you'd like to see (since it's not nuclear energy)?
>>>     
>>>       
>> Let me predict (hands to my head): "Conservation! Now!" In other
>> words, the whole society has to change the way it does things. Right
>> Now.
>>
>> Well-proven in history: the only way to _profoundly_ change
>> Americans' habits it through the old pocketbook. Like right now.
>> Crying "conserve!" does next-to-nothing. Conservation has to happen,
>> but it won't happen in the short term and not without economic
>> disincentive.
>>
>> Oh, yeah, those with no ideas but conservation (no nukes, no coal, no
>> NG, no new drilling, no no no) are the same ones who cry "unfair"
>> when oil prices go up.
>>
>> Ken
>>   
>>     
> The price of petroleum based fuels in the USA is around $4.00 to $5.00 
> per gallon.  This is very reasonable compared to the prices paid by most 
> other countries around the world, especially Europe.  The European 
> countries tax  petroleum based fuel very heavily at the pump, which 
> brings in government revenue and encourages conservation.  A gallon of 
> regular gas will run you better than $9.00 per gallon in Europe.
>
> It's to bad the Bush Administration didn't go this route, rather than 
> running up the deficit and financing  the congressional appropriations 
> and special authorizations with USA treasury bond and note.  such debt 
> now runs into the trillions of dollar; like 10 trillion. 
>
> Regards,
>
> LelandJ
>   

If the USA would come up with a tax policy that gave tax breaks to our 
trucking industry, which consume mostly diesel, it would cushion the 
blow of the tax being passed on to oridnary consumes in good and 
services, but place a higher tax on gasoline, which is consume by  
ordinary citizens, the tax would mostly be paid by people who can afford 
to drive gas gussling auto, and the tax would be almost a far as the USA 
progressive income tax.

Regards,

LelandJ

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to