On Sep 23, 2008, at 8:13 AM, Christof Wollenhaupt wrote:
>> Instead, it claims to have been "by design", without explaining what
>> benefit this supposed design decision adds.
>
> What about getting reasonable speed with the report writer and low
> memory
> consumption?
What about saying something like that, instead of just leaving it
looking like a cop-out?
What about checking the string length, and using the more efficient
algorithm when possible?
I don't expect perfection, nor can I deliver it. But I do expect
honesty, and always strive to be honest about problems in my code.
-- Ed Leafe
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
