We (sadly) expect politicians to lie to us, and are naturally more tolerant
of the lies of "our side" (insofar as we take sides) than the lies of the
other side. We distinguish between bogus campaign promises (such as Obama's
clever but totally insincere "middle class tax cut" ruse, or McCain's idea
that cutting out earmarks is some kind of hatchet and not, in fact, the
tiniest of scalpels) and outright lies--the latter being rather about facts
of the past and not vague promises about the future.
One thing became clear to me last night, and that is that McCain is too
blunt an instrument to cut through the fog of deception around Obama, whose
capacity to lie on the most profound levels is unmatched by anybody I've
ever seen in political life, even Bill Clinton. (By the way, speaking of
insincerity, watching Bill Clinton hold Bush Sr.'s hand in a Fox news/Greta
interview the other day, like they were best buddies in the world, and
seeing him say such nice things about both Bush Sr and Dubya, really drove
home what a "professional wrestling" fraud our two party system is
today--but that's beside the point.)
It's almost as if McCain's role in this phoney WWE smackdown contest is to
miss the mark and hit the mat hard, because the real Obama is an eminently
beatable opponent. At least, on the surface.
I have spent a lot of time cataloguing for anybody interested the real and
lasting influences on Obama's life, ascent to power, and political mission.
Nobody is interested. They want to believe the lie, and it's just that
simple.
So, I'm going to focus my future efforts on explaining to posterity what
happened.
When freedom-loving folks like Saakashvili are hanging from lampposts,
Columbia and other allies is invaded by Venezuela or other enemies (or an
internal coup turns it Red), all with the implicit approval of Uncle Sam;
when our schools become little Nazi/Pioneer training grounds for future
revolutionaries after the ideology of Saul Alinsky, and Bill Ayers/Hugo
Chavez I might add; when our two party system becomes a permanent one-party
system and free elections are run like they were in Iraq (ACORN is just a
dry run); when freedom of press and speech are utterly stamped out by
government control of the airwaves and media, in the name of "fairness" no
doubt; when forced abortion becomes US policy in the name of population
control--just like in China; when race riots are incited to spread both the
wealth and our blood around in the service of "social justice" -- well, I
for one won't be too surprised. It can happen here, and apparently it will
happen here.
I view Obama as a pure sociopath. There is simply no way he can so smoothly
pull off such profound lies -- like the lie that anybody said "kill him" at
a Palin rally, which the Secret Service today refuted, and is right out of
Saul Alinsky's playbook and was very effectively employed, or the lie he
tried to tell about what he said to Joe Plumber (which bore zero resemblance
to what he actually said, which was caught on tape) -- and not be a
sociopath.
Those are not even the hum-dingers. The hum-dingers include the claim that
the big influences on his thinking are all these beltway and business
insiders, and yet every single relationship that you scrutinize in his
history prior to his presidential campaign are larcenists, racists,
Marxists, and radical anti-American activists, and his few official
activities as US senator include support of a murderous communist thug in
Kenya (who may or may not be his cousin, but certainly appears when they're
on the stump together to be his political soul-mate in that part of the
world) and the Global Poverty Act of 2007, which pledged to tithe 6% of US
GDP to the UN -- a proposal that McCain mysteriously never mentions.
Another hum-dinger is that somehow by electing Obama we're sticking it to
the people who caused the current meltdown. Precisely the opposite is true,
but people want to believe the lie. After all Bush is president, he's
clearly an idiot, and so there, it must be all his fault, and not Barney
Franks', or Franklin Raines' or Chris Dodd's, or any of a dozen shady
characters who brought about the subprime mortgage fiasco in the name of
"affordable housing", and super-sized it using Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac.
Obama even explained in his memoirs (assuming Ayers didn't ghostwrite it for
him) what a fraud he is inside, when he describes how easily he lied to his
mother about his addictions, and how he felt, working at a corporation, like
"a spy behind enemy lines". These are not made up right-wing fictions about
him--they are facts he recorded about himself, and very revealing facts, at
that, right in his own published memoirs.
Well, let's just say you have to be willfully blind to believe the lie about
who he says he is now, and what he's going to do, and what it means for the
future of this country.
With a supermajority there will be NOTHING, literally NOTHING, to stop him
and the radical leftists who currently run Congress from doing ANYTHING they
want to do.
If it is God's will, so be it. The same God who hardened Pharoah's heart has
hardened the heart of a majority of Americans, for reasons that are
inscrutable to me at this time. But I know based on all I've learned, and
believe in my spirit, that America is going to be shaken to its foundations
before it figures out what it did to itself, if it elects this man and gives
him a super majority in Congress.
What happens next is anybody's guess. But America, as a constitutional
republic, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for
all, will cease to exist.
The buildings and some of the people will still be here, but it will be a
ghost of its former self.
- Bob
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Adam Buckland
> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 10:23 AM
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: [OT] - The way it was viewed
>
> Presidential debate: Polls suggest Barack Obama beat John McCain
>
>
>
> Despite John McCain's strident performance in the final US presidential
> debate, snap polls awarded the contest decisively to Barack Obama,
> while
> a bookmaker said it would pay out on bets on the Democratic candidate.
>
>
>
> Mr Obama was judged to have "done the best job" in the debate by 58 per
> cent of independent voters in a CNN poll, with 31 per cent plumping for
> Mr McCain. Mr Obama also did better among Republican voters than Mr
> McCain did among Democrats. A total of 18 per cent of Republican voters
> said Mr Obama did best, while only five per cent of Democrats preferred
> Mr McCain.
>
>
>
> The Democratic candidate also gained general approval among the
> independent voters, while the Republican senator lost ground in this
> respect. While Mr Obama's favourable/unfavourable rating went from
> 63/35
> before the debate to 66/33 afterwards, Mr McCain's sank from 51/45 to
> 49/49.
>
>
>
> Shortly after the debate, the Irish bookmaker Paddy Power said it would
> pay out to customers who had predicted Mr Obama would win the election.
> A spokesman for the bookmaker, which has taken more than 10,000 bets on
> the election, said: "We declare this race well and truly over and
> congratulate all those who backed Obama, your winnings await you.
>
>
>
> "Although the Senator seemed a little off sorts in last night's final
> debate we believe he has done more than enough to get him across the
> line on November 4th."
>
>
>
> The disparity was even more marked among 500 uncommitted voters polled
> after watching the debate on CBS: Mr Obama won 53 per cent of the vote
> compared with 22 per cent who came out for Mr McCain. A total of 14 per
> cent of these unaligned voters said the debate had made up their mind
> to
> vote for Mr McCain, while 28 per cent said they would now be voting for
> Mr Obama and 58 per cent still weren't sure.
>
>
>
> While 54 per cent of CBS's undecided voters thought Mr Obama "shared
> their values" before the debate, this had risen nine per cent by its
> end. Meanwhile Mr McCain enjoyed a smaller bump, from 53 per cent
> beforehand to 56 afterwards.
>
>
>
> A focus group of 23 uncommitted voters in Arlington, Virginia, convened
> for the Fox News network by the pollster Frank Luntz, who is often seen
> on BBC Newsnight, also awarded the tie to Mr Obama. While a clear
> majority said Mr Obama had performed best, when asked who thought Mr
> McCain had won the tie, none raised their hand.
>
>
>
> Mr Luntz said: "None had made a decision to support Senator Obama
> before
> the debate, but more than half supported him after the debate. It was a
> good night for Barack Obama."
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
> text/plain (text body -- kept)
> text/html
> ---
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
