> I do wish that it would give a hard copy, but then again, > none of the mechanical voting machines ever did that, > so I guess I can't complain.
The difference is that we've all developed interfaces that showed one thing on-screen and recorded another internally. While we then went ahead and fixed our bugs, implementing a corrupt electronic system that changes votes is much easier than what would have to be a kludgy mechanical one. At least with hard copies, there'd be a count that could be used to verify electronic results. -Jerry Wolper [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
