If they were economically viable, why would it always take so much public (read non-riding taxpayers) investment. If they charged what the ride really cost, it's doubtful there would be nearly as many riders. So, why should I pay for someone else to get transportation that does not help me.
Please don't go into the environmental whacko stuff about this 'investment' takes cars off the road. That is just a smoke screen. Why should we subsidize transportation for some? Larry Miller ----- Original Message ----- From: Kristyne McDaniel To: 'ProFox Email List' Sent: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 03:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Subject: RE: [OT] Idiot Californians approve Bullet Train development Californians do indeed use trains. I used them a lot until we moved to a location where the trains don't pass. I know a lot of people that use them every day to commute into Los Angeles. Kristyne McDaniel http://www.kristynemcdaniel.com/blog http://www.emryldadvantage.com/ http://www.mcstyles.com/ Whether you think you can, or you think you can't.... you are right. -- Henry Ford --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
