Whoops, I'm having trouble talking today. LOL  I should have said "a 
pardoned felon, rather than  "a felon".  The whole allegation doesn't 
just doesn't make sense.

Regards,

LelandJ
 



Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
> Right, I should have a pardoned felon.
>
> Regards,
>
> LelandJ
>
>
> Stephen Russell wrote:
>   
>> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> If doesn't make sense that Timothy M. Kaine, governor of Virginia, would
>>> have been motivated by the Presidential election to pardon 1,500 felons;
>>> because, the risk of using this method to rig an presidential election
>>> would be extremely high for essential no rewards, as well as extreme
>>> inefficient.  You guys need to stop assigning sinister election
>>> manipulating motives to every action that can somehow be associated with
>>> the Presidential election.
>>>
>>> 1)  A felcon can be either a Republican or a Democrat, so there is no
>>> way to know how many votes Republican votes would have resulted for
>>> pardoning 1,500 felons.
>>>
>>> 2)  A felon is less likely to vote than a non-felon.
>>>     
>>>       
>> ----------------------------
>>
>> On a state by state basis but felons are not allowed to vote.
>> <http://www.speakout.com/activism/issue_briefs/1289b-1.html>
>>
>>
>>
>>   
>>     
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to