David Smith wrote: > As opposed to rolling up on a Greyhound or in a Yugo? I don't get it. The > leaders of these companies and the others looking for some tax money to bail > themselves out of the fire have every right to travel as they always would, > as it is no less ridiculously wasteful and excessive for them to travel that > way now than it was before everything hit the fan. I understand that you > would think they would have the common sense to think about these things but > obviously it doesn't matter at all in any significant way to the people they > are trying to make inroads with or else they would have done otherwise. This > sort of reporting by ABC isn't "news" to anyone, and to expect some sort of > contrite behavior from these people is at best foolish and at worst guilty > of stirring up class-envy. I credit "working" America with significantly > more intelligence than this story does.
It reminds me of the movie "Fun with Dick and Jane" with George Segal and Jane Fonda when the food stamps inspector comes over to their house to evaluate them and they're eating a glamorous, very expensive meal complete with expensive champagne while dressed lavishly and stylishly as well. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
