On Nov 20, 2008, at 2:06 PM, Alan Lukachko wrote:
> Perhaps you misunderstood, I'm not looking for absolutes. I just
> stated
> "that there is no absolute in any theory".
Well, since we've been talking about science, isn't that a
fundamental assumption?
Scientific understanding is constantly evolving. Hypotheses are
proposed to explain data. When they no longer explain the observed
facts, they are amended or discarded. Global warming as a result of
human action best explains the current data.
-- Ed Leafe
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
