We Ed... were you there at the time coz it sure doesn't sound like it. We
had the prophets of doom predicting a world-wide collapse of society. We had
thousands of people predicting chaos and disaster. People filled up their
tubs with water expecting the water companies to fail. Spam (canned meat)
had its biggest sales in history as people expected the food distribution
system to fail. Batteries and torches and candles were the order of the day
as people expected to be living without major services. No-one wanted to fly
over midnight in case the planes crashed.

As IT professionals, we knew better, but did that stop the panic? Nope. It
was absurd and embarrassingly ridiculous to hear some of the expectations
about the End of the World as we knew it.

Y2K sounded a LOT like Global Warming. Same premise (end of the World), same
logic (none) and identical result (panic). If I were a conspiracy theorist
(and I am most definitely not - quite the contrary) I would say that Y2K was
the practice run for Global Warming.

But seriously, how can anyone genuinely support GW whole-heartedly when its
single major premise (global warming) isn't occurring and temperatures are
dropping?

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ed Leafe
Sent: Friday, 21 November 2008 7:43 AM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] A**hole Gore and his junk "science" whore

On Nov 20, 2008, at 2:48 PM, Geoff Flight wrote:

> I remember Y2K... this feels familiar.


        Yeah - I remember Y2K too. What happened was that a problem was  
identified, and steps were taken to fix it before it caused horrible  
problems. Sounds like a good way to deal with things.


-- Ed Leafe





[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to