The only problem with that is that the planet is cooling. I'm no climatologist but when every single prediction of the climate-change model is wrong; when temperatures are dropping, not rising and when the UN's primary source of climate-change data admits to having seriously flawed (or fraudulent) data I start to doubt the proposition.
I remember Y2K... this feels familiar. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe Sent: Friday, 21 November 2008 6:56 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] A**hole Gore and his junk "science" whore On Nov 20, 2008, at 2:06 PM, Alan Lukachko wrote: > Perhaps you misunderstood, I'm not looking for absolutes. I just > stated > "that there is no absolute in any theory". Well, since we've been talking about science, isn't that a fundamental assumption? Scientific understanding is constantly evolving. Hypotheses are proposed to explain data. When they no longer explain the observed facts, they are amended or discarded. Global warming as a result of human action best explains the current data. -- Ed Leafe [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
