Stephen Russell wrote: >> Ten years ago I had the pseudocode ready for an unspecified development >> tool medical research app. I had been experimenting with FoxPro 3 for >> DOS and later VFP 5 as the tool for some four years when that "SP3 for >> Win2K" EULA crap hit the fan and at the same time M$ came after us (a >> low-buck 501 (c) (3) charity) over Win 95 licenses. >> >> http://leafe.com/archives/showMsg/138654 > -------------------------- > > Do you have a clue as to why M$ didn't want you to use 95? > > BTW it was not to sell you 98 licenses. :)
Hi Stephen! The Great Satan *said* it was against the law for them to let us to use Windows 95. That set off my bs meter and I asked my congresswoman to check it. She asked for, and got, a federal investigator to look into it. Several months later, no word on what it cost, the answer came back: It was *not* illegal for MS to let us to use Windows 95. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
