Stephen Russell wrote: > On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Pete Theisen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The Great Satan *said* it was against the law for them to let us to use >> Windows 95. That set off my bs meter and I asked my congresswoman to >> check it. She asked for, and got, a federal investigator to look into it. >> >> Several months later, no word on what it cost, the answer came back: It >> was *not* illegal for MS to let us to use Windows 95.
> Didn't they stop Win95 upgrades that year? Knowing that it was the > MOST INSECURE os at the time? Only way to fix it was to stop it. > Granted 98 was not much better. :) Hi Stephen! Our deployment was going to be to the desktop and an internal network, not on the web. The machines did not even have floppy drives. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
