Stephen Russell wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 5:28 PM, MB Software Solutions General Account
>> Again...in a closed loop, binary is fine.  However, I think many would
>> agree that there are some out there in geekdom who simply crave the latest
>> buzzwords, claiming they're the panacea for all things IT just so they can
>> say they're using the latest in technology.  Shame on them.
>>
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Take off your VFP blinders and use peripheral vision.

LOL!!!  Ever true, you manage to take a neutral, non-VFP-like comment
and bash VFP.  I love your replies.  So entertaining!  ;-)


>
> XML has been around for about 12 years or so.  If it sucked it would
> not be used as widely today as it is.  It is used because it is a
> great container for data.  I'll call it a temporary container vs
> Paul's storage.  Within a single container you can add many other
> containers so concepts like flexible are virtues that we all like.
>
> Secondly because it is a markup your at the lowest common denominator
> for crossing boundaries within your app or across the globe.
>
> Lastly it is queryable and that is very important to many of us.
>
> I just sent you a request in xml and you replied back to me the
> answer.  I need to see what your response was and if I should save the
> results on my side or not.
>

Yeah, well, my answer is the same, regardless of what you just
said--it's no different and still applicable.





_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to