They weren't actual timings. They were used to reflect the difference in effect of a 5:1 ratio in various bandwidth scenarios.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe Sent: Wednesday, 14 January 2009 2:45 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [NF] M$ is pushing ahead for performance On Jan 13, 2009, at 9:42 PM, Geoff Flight wrote: > It's not about drive space but bandwidth on networks including > relatively > slow speed internet. 100kvs 20k is a 5:1 ratio that is significant > when it > is the difference between 5secs and 1 sec refresh time on an app. > 5ms vs 1ms > is not significant on a wide bandwidth network. Well, if you're talking about a closed system, you're talking about a LAN. If you have a 5sec refresh time on a closed local network, I would respectfully suggest that the problem isn't the XML. -- Ed Leafe [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
