That is only true while the network is not saturated. Sending 5 times the data that is necessary (and in reality the ratio is far higher) is pointless as well as a potential problem. XML should only be used when there is a genuine need not as a typical scenario.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe Sent: Wednesday, 14 January 2009 2:57 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [NF] M$ is pushing ahead for performance On Jan 13, 2009, at 10:21 PM, Geoff Flight wrote: > They weren't actual timings. They were used to reflect the > difference in > effect of a 5:1 ratio in various bandwidth scenarios. I understand. My point was that the range of timings you chose indicate a broken network. In real life, the 5:1 ratio would be more like 0.00005 seconds vs. 0.00001 seconds. Yeah, there's a difference, but... -- Ed Leafe [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
