On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Matt Jarvis <[email protected]> wrote:
> Show off... > > Let me join the fray on this... I prefer SR's version since to me it is > much more readable, which I always thought was (one of) the point of > XML. Granted yours is much less verbose... > > Do standard readers such as those built into browsers handle the > "attribute-based XML"? ------------------------------------------ Your searching is done differently but the results are the same. After you get good with XML / XSLT go to this site to get your humble on: <http://xmlchallenge.com/?gclid=CKWv-aGHkZgCFQZlswodi24Eng> One fellow employee a use to work with would try to make a mark there. He was very dynamic with XML. I didn't stand a chance, and he put up the fight! -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer First Horizon Bank Memphis TN 901.246-0159 _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
