> I do notice that nobody has disputed my definition of a Conspiracy > Theorist.
Here again you seem to need the "community" to accept your definitions. You don't seem capable of standing on your own definitions without that acceptance. > I think we all know who and what they are. Naturally, you (want to) think everybody always agrees with you. > The trouble is when we see > SOME > of them in us. No the trouble is when you see more of them in somebody else. - Bob > Keep in mind I was only comparing Ricardo's posts favorably to Geoff's. > Ricardo then immediately conceded victory to Geoff. > > - Bob _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
