Bob Calco wrote: >>>> So you are playing games. >>>> >>>> >>> Why should I take either of you seriously? >>> >>> >> You shouldn't take me seriously. >> > > Actually I don't, and I think we have an understanding of each other on this > point. ;) > > And frankly I think it's helped our dialog tremendously. :) > So long as you don't forget that you should not take the "way" I say things seriously but that many a time the underlying message is deadly serious. Trouble is us people tend to only believe what WE came up with, so if I get serious and explain every issue and it's ramification it will be deadly boring and you'll probably come up with a counter for every one of them (logic is a whore). So I'd rather shake you with an irony or an outrageous retort in order to see if you get to think something new on your own. I should admit my success is as much as with the other method...... but I get more fun :-P
> >> But Geoff is talking seriously, so >> even >> if you don't agree with him an educated person would take him seriously >> (or at least pretend to). >> > > He is not taking anything seriously but his own opinion. > > I tried taking his arguments seriously, and I seriously extended my own > points and counter-points on many occasions, but he simply doesn't want to > confront information that takes him out of his comfort zone without making > it about the other person's mental health, or some kind of group-think > referendum. > Why shouldn't he, you are nuts....certified! And the whole group thinks so..... except the other nut cases as Mike, Pete, etc. Look at you, if that kind of people were agreeing with me and praising me they I'd know it's time for a great introspection and to examine everything in my image of the world. > This latest "observation" about how everyone agrees with his definition of > conspiracy theorist and his ham-fisted way of attempting once again to > attach that label to me And he is absolutely right. > after I effectively demolished his argument > point-by-point in a separate thread, and despite the fact that this post > itself has nothing whatever to do with conspiracies, proves how un-seriously > he's taking any debate. > Nah! You bored him to death, as you did every one of us. --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
