> > Funny, you and he want slack for *how* you express your very serious > > opinions, but extend none of that slack to others, like Mike or me. > > > Now you've got it! Good!
:| > > Well this is convenient, and disingenuous, since you're always > harping on > > the rest of us to defend everything logically. > > > That has to do with the internal consistency you talk about later. > Logic > is a whore, but I can't stand stupid. And of course stupid is whatever you don't agree with. > > I agree logic is a Whore. The best we can ask of logic is to help > identify > > internal inconsistency between our assumptions, our premises, our > predicates > > and our conclusions. First truths are not proven, or disproven, by > mere > > logic. They require experiential evidence to validate, which is a > Liar as > > often as Logic is a Whore. Metaphysics, alas, is a Bitch. > > > Now you're talking! > You forgot to mention the fact that in any of these analysis there are > tons of things (reality is complex) that we consider to be out of the > scope of the problem, but we don't PROVE that they are out of it, so > there you have another big hole through which people usually cheat. I agree with that point. How we scope a particular piece of information in terms of relevancy often is the problem, and it seldom gets enough attention as the source of discord in a dialog. > > I actually enjoy learning about other people's logical conundrums and > > experiential quandries, > Damn! And now he starts with four syllable words. The only arguably four-syllable word in that sentence is "actually," actually. > > You guys just can't admit it, or handle it, so you reduce the > conversations > > to ad hominems. > > > Shit! I wish I could read minds as you do, must be a christian thing to > know exactly what other people can or can't admit or handle. Geoff has it too. > > > > Actually I know you're capable of the other method and wish you'd try > it out > > more often. You give up too easy on yourself---ergo you do the same > to > > others. > > > And you don't know half of it. Many times I can't express the finer > points because of lack of words or.... expression twists(?)(does that > mean something in english?), so I leave many things out. You just see > the coarser part of my logic process (imagine how bad it would be if > english was my first language). I should learn Spanish one of these days. It would also help me at the local DMV here in Tampa, too. > > Same could be said of the cadre of kooks you hang with. > > > > Actually I like a lot of folks on this list, > And yet you just called them kooks (whatever that means). It was that "irony" idiom you claim to know so much about. > > Blah blah blah. > > > > > Now you're getting it! Blah blah blah. ;) > >> Nah! You bored him to death, as you did every one of us. > >> > > > > Right. Sure. > > > > > LOL Blah blah blah. - Bob _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
