If a company sends you a cheque by mistake then you are not entitled to the
money. Just as if you found a large sum of money in the street - it isn't
yours. How many times have you read about people who've had money
accidentally deposited to their accounts who went and spent it believing
they had a right to something that wasn't there. The law is pretty clear.
The morality is even clearer.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, 24 February 2009 8:53 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [NF] M$ wants their layoff $$ back

Well however they determined that some were underpaid, and if they
legitamantly where then it could be said that they "deserve" and should get
more money. Those that got overpaid, no one has said by how much, which
would be interesting to know. And second, they cashed the check and
microsoft sent the check and allowed it to be cashed. They should be allowed
to keep the money as technically they both made a deal and both parties
accepted it. And from what i could gather from the articles microsoft is
"asking" for the money back, not "demandinga" which leads me to believe that
there is little legal action they could do to get the money back.

Just my 10 cents

Mike
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Sytze de Boer <[email protected]>

Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:07:43 
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [NF] M$ wants their layoff $$ back


Then I must be an idiot.
Mistakes happen. Are you saying the ones who were underpaid (and who are
asking for an adjustment) are also idiots?



On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Michael Madigan
<[email protected]>wrote:

>
> Only an idiot would send them back their money.
>
> *************************************************
> 1/20/2013 Eviction Notice
>
> http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6169336
>
>
> --- On Mon, 2/23/09, MB Software Solutions General Account <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > From: MB Software Solutions General Account <
> [email protected]>
> > Subject: [NF] M$ wants their layoff $$ back
> > To: [email protected]
> > Date: Monday, February 23, 2009, 3:57 PM
> > Sad, but true:
> > http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,498666,00.html
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Post Messages to: [email protected]
> > Subscription Maintenance:
> > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> > OT-free version of this list:
> > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> > Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> > This message:
> >
>
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/30928.69.7.77.20.1235422639.squirrel@
webmail.dssco.net
> > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are
> > the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or
> > medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for
> > those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to