I can't believe what I'm reading in some of these posts.
I guess it shows how low some will stoop when it involves a company that is
disliked
I call that "selective morality"

I like all the analogies used by others re finding money in the street etc.
I send out program update "invitations each year, and I remoind my clients
that is an invite, not an invoice. Every year, I have a minimum of 10 people
who pay me on the invite as well as the invoice (which, by law, I must send
when i send them a cd)
Would I keep this 2nd payment ? No way
So, call me an idiot.
But I sleep well

Sytze

On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Geoff Flight <data...@adam.com.au> wrote:

> If a company sends you a cheque by mistake then you are not entitled to the
> money. Just as if you found a large sum of money in the street - it isn't
> yours. How many times have you read about people who've had money
> accidentally deposited to their accounts who went and spent it believing
> they had a right to something that wasn't there. The law is pretty clear.
> The morality is even clearer.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf
> Of m...@mikewohlrab.com
> Sent: Tuesday, 24 February 2009 8:53 AM
> To: profox@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: [NF] M$ wants their layoff $$ back
>
> Well however they determined that some were underpaid, and if they
> legitamantly where then it could be said that they "deserve" and should get
> more money. Those that got overpaid, no one has said by how much, which
> would be interesting to know. And second, they cashed the check and
> microsoft sent the check and allowed it to be cashed. They should be
> allowed
> to keep the money as technically they both made a deal and both parties
> accepted it. And from what i could gather from the articles microsoft is
> "asking" for the money back, not "demandinga" which leads me to believe
> that
> there is little legal action they could do to get the money back.
>
> Just my 10 cents
>
> Mike
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sytze de Boer <sy...@kiss.co.nz>
>
> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:07:43
> To: <profoxt...@leafe.com>
> Subject: Re: [NF] M$ wants their layoff $$ back
>
>
> Then I must be an idiot.
> Mistakes happen. Are you saying the ones who were underpaid (and who are
> asking for an adjustment) are also idiots?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Michael Madigan
> <mmadi10...@yahoo.com>wrote:
>
> >
> > Only an idiot would send them back their money.
> >
> > *************************************************
> > 1/20/2013 Eviction Notice
> >
> > http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6169336
> >
> >
> > --- On Mon, 2/23/09, MB Software Solutions General Account <
> > mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:
> >
> > > From: MB Software Solutions General Account <
> > mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com>
> > > Subject: [NF] M$ wants their layoff $$ back
> > > To: profox@leafe.com
> > > Date: Monday, February 23, 2009, 3:57 PM
> > > Sad, but true:
> > > http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,498666,00.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
> > > Subscription Maintenance:
> > > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> > > OT-free version of this list:
> > > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> > > Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> > > This message:
> > >
> >
>
> http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/30928.69.7.77.20.1235422639.squirrel@
> webmail.dssco.net
> > > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are
> > > the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or
> > > medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for
> > > those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/367498c40902231449k244a625brad8a22d96908c...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to